Is rdfs:Resource always implied?

According to the spec [1]:

> All things described by RDF are called resources, and are instances of
the class rdfs:Resource.

Does this mean that the triple corresponding to that statement is always
implied?  For instance, say I have:

<rdfs:Resource rdf:about="#foo" />

The above serialization corresponds to the statement:

#foo <rdf:type> <rdfs:Resource>

However, consider the following:

<rdf:Description rdf:about="#foo" />

Since the spec says that everything in RDF is a resource, would the
above graph also imply the statement (which is the same one as before):

#foo <rdf:type> <rdfs:Resource>

???	

--
Jimmy Cerra

] "You know, honey, what you need is a nice,
]  long vacation, away from theories, and
]  test-tubes, and guinea-pig cats..."

Received on Thursday, 29 May 2003 20:26:48 UTC