- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:04:49 -0800
- To: James Michael DuPont <mdupont777@yahoo.com>
- CC: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
James Michael DuPont wrote: >Oh, no! Google does not do RDF! >I will write to them, asking them to index the rdf files... >google labs.... cool > I guess not. When new RDF files are published, if we refer to them in our blogs, then Googel will pick them up. The document could be described in the item description,- one item, one document - and the link would be the URI of the document. We could standardize on one key word for these kinds of entires --- say "rdfDocument". If everybody did that it would help discovery and we could find them all with a Google search for rdfDocument +<keywords>. To go beyond Googel and index the rdf:Resources inside the the documents, we will need some other (hopefully distributed) search mechinism of the actual triples. Anyway , you've compiled some great data :) ..... I just hope it dont get lost in the scuffle. ... hi Mdupont, remember me ? Seth Russell http://radio.weblogs.com/0113759/
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 12:05:22 UTC