Re: call for alpha testers EulerSharp for dotgnu/pnet

> > > Thanks,
> >
> > you're welcome Mike
> >
> > > maybe we can find a savannah page for this?  We need a cvs.
> > > Otherwise we can host it under one other project.
> >
> > dunno what a savannah page is, but don't mind
> > I think it's up to you here to come up with
> > a good proposal ;-)
>
> Savannah.gnu.org is a project hosting system,
> the best thing woul be for you to register with them, and request a
> hosting space for the project. If you would like, I can handle this for
> you.

DanBri, what do you think?
I mean where to put EulerSharp
there is also dev.w3.org and I've
put a W3C Software Short Notice
in our current distribution

> >
> > > I would like to use this to process the RDF from the gcc, inside
> > the
> > > gcc,
> >
> > sounds good!
> > thoughts about other testcases?
> yes, I still need to test! I have not tried all the tests, but
> I will setup a makefile and test driver.

great, I look forward to the results!
our current Euler.cs runs on
the 1.1 beta .NET Framework redistributable dor win2k
and runs all the tests in http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/etc
but for the RDF parsing we use AskJena.cs which
is an http bridge to Jena which is running on a java VM
also, I think that compatibility with
http://www.ecma.ch/publications/standards/ECMA-334.HTM
http://www.ecma.ch/publications/standards/ECMA-335.HTM
is what really matters

> > (preferably using proofs)
>
> This is what i need to learn more about, to be honest, I dont fully
> grok the CWM/Euler software, I just know it is what i need.

;-)

> > >  For embedding the Euler into the GCC, i need only GPL modules.
> > > I would like to re-licensed Euler under the GPL, is that possible?
> >
> > what really matters to me is "W3C SOFTWARE NOTICE AND LICENSE"
> > --
> > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
> > and therefore I would like to follow that one
> > in there I read that it
> > [[
> > is written so as to preserve the Free Software Foundation's
> > assessment of GPL compatibility and OSI's certification under
> > the Open Source Definition.
> > ]]
>
> Great, that means that I dont have to relicense it.
> Lets leave that along for now, until we have cross that bridge.
>
> But the n3 parser for example, that would be good as part of the
> dotgnu.rdf native implementation. I dont know if we can include w3c
> licensed code as part of the dotgnu project. Can you give me permission
> to dual license it? Disjunct under the GPL and under the w3c?
> :)

the n3 parser can't live with the engine
the n3 parser is a real quick hack and DanC
had the good idea to put it in a separate file
but it really needs Euler.cs everywhere

> >
> >
> > > BTW:
> > > I have just commited the updated dotgnu RDF stuff
> > > you can find it here:
> > > CVS: cvs -z3
> > > -d:pserver:anoncvs@subversions.gnu.org:/cvsroot/dotgnu-libs co
> > > dotgnu.rdf
> > >
> > > and I made a source deb :
> > >
> >
>
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/debian/incoming/dotgnu.rdf_0.2-1.tar.gz
> > >
> > > you can find the dotgnu stuff at www.dotgnu.org, I suggest using
> > the
> > > cvs.
> >
> > will definitely do that asap!
>
> That rdflib is not running yet, it is just a stubbed interface.
> The n3 parsed
>
> =====
> James Michael DuPont
> http://introspector.sourceforge.net/

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Sunday, 9 February 2003 08:26:30 UTC