- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:34:30 -0700
- To: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spin.ie>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I try to use Q-names or unqualified names where possible (because it greatly enhances readability). That's one reason that I like interfacing to the RDF world through TAP. TAP has a neat facility for managing the URIs. Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spin.ie> To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 9:39 AM Subject: RE: Alternatives to XML for RDF? > > > I just skimmed through the Adenine paper. > > It certainly is easier to read than XML, > > but it's a far cry from MKR. > > > > MKR was specifically designed to be English-like > > for easy readability. > > > > MKR is also UNIX-shell-like which makes for > > easy integration with Linux & Windows commands. > > Where do URIs fit into MKR? > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 13:34:59 UTC