- From: rhodgson <rhodgson@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:05:18 -0400
- To: "'Ashley Yakeley'" <ashley@semantic.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I found an amusing article that someone wrote about coming to terms with RDF. I refer you to http://www.disobey.com/detergent/2002/sw123/. Bottom line - humans can but are not meant to read RDF. Ralph Hodgson TopQuadrant, Inc. Office: (724) 846-9300, Fax: (425) 955-5469, Cell: (781) 789-1664 http://www.topquadrant.com -----Original Message----- From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ashley Yakeley Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 7:10 PM To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org Subject: Alternatives to XML for RDF? I have to say RDF in XML is ugly. Are there alternative ways of representing RDF? -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
Received on Sunday, 10 August 2003 12:13:54 UTC