W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2003

RE: Alternatives to XML for RDF?

From: rhodgson <rhodgson@topquadrant.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:05:18 -0400
To: "'Ashley Yakeley'" <ashley@semantic.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c35f59$36154ec0$dcb18318@TQBEDFORD>

I found an amusing article that someone wrote about coming to terms with
RDF. I refer you to http://www.disobey.com/detergent/2002/sw123/. Bottom
line - humans can but are not meant to read RDF.

Ralph Hodgson
TopQuadrant, Inc. 
Office: (724) 846-9300, Fax: (425) 955-5469, Cell: (781) 789-1664

-----Original Message-----
From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ashley Yakeley
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 7:10 PM
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Subject: Alternatives to XML for RDF?

I have to say RDF in XML is ugly. Are there alternative ways of 
representing RDF?

Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
Received on Sunday, 10 August 2003 12:13:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:43 UTC