- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:38:00 -0700
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Ashley Yakeley" <ashley@semantic.org>
Since nobody else has mentioned MKR, I will say that
it is also much nicer than XML.
http://rhm.cdepot.net/
MKR is also a more powerful language -- it includes
context, questions and commands.
A recent addition to the MKE implementation is a
user-friendly interface to
Stanford TAP KB
Google
Amazon.com
I will be sending out some examples in the next few days.
My future plans include a user-friendly interface to OpenCyc.
Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ashley Yakeley" <ashley@semantic.org>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Alternatives to XML for RDF?
>
> In article <006201c35ed3$aee72480$27bc0150@localhost>,
> "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com> wrote:
>
> > Notation3:
> > http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer
> > http://infomesh.net/2002/notation3/
>
> Thanks, this is much nicer than XML.
>
> --
> Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
>
>
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 21:38:56 UTC