- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:38:00 -0700
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Ashley Yakeley" <ashley@semantic.org>
Since nobody else has mentioned MKR, I will say that it is also much nicer than XML. http://rhm.cdepot.net/ MKR is also a more powerful language -- it includes context, questions and commands. A recent addition to the MKE implementation is a user-friendly interface to Stanford TAP KB Google Amazon.com I will be sending out some examples in the next few days. My future plans include a user-friendly interface to OpenCyc. Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashley Yakeley" <ashley@semantic.org> To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:32 PM Subject: Re: Alternatives to XML for RDF? > > In article <006201c35ed3$aee72480$27bc0150@localhost>, > "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com> wrote: > > > Notation3: > > http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3 > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer > > http://infomesh.net/2002/notation3/ > > Thanks, this is much nicer than XML. > > -- > Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA > >
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 21:38:56 UTC