- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 20:57:56 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Ashley Yakeley <ashley@semantic.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Many people represent it through an interface - such as nodes and arcs diagrams, in RDFAuthor [1] or IsaViz [2], or more specialised versions such as foafnaut [3] or IsaViz's GSS. [1] http://rdfweb.org/people/damian/RDFAuthor/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/11/IsaViz/ [3] http://foafnaut.org/ XML is nice because it can be used with XML tools - XQuery, Xforms, XSLT, etc. But I agree, the syntax looks ugly. (But then, I find most code syntax looks ugly - fortunately I am not a computer program and can find or develop a nicer interface to it ;-) cheers Charles McCN On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Ashley Yakeley wrote: > >I have to say RDF in XML is ugly. Are there alternative ways of >representing RDF? > >-- >Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA > Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22 Post: 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia or W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 20:57:57 UTC