- From: Adrian Walker <adrianw@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:38:23 -0400
- To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20030810221732.02255040@pop.snet.net>
Roger --
Thanks for the pointer to your paper on Enhancing Data Interoperability.
The idea seems very nice. Yet the notation kind of overwhelms even the
simple illustrative examples. So, one wonders what real world examples
would look like.
I understand that the notation is intended to be machine- rather
human-readable. But someone, or something has to write the content into it
in the first place.
Attached is an example, based on your paper, in a different notation.
I'm guessing that there is a way of generating the Owl/rdf notation from
the attached example. Do you think that would be useful ?
Cheers, -- Adrian
PS: The example can be run by pointing a Netscape or Mozilla browser to
www.reengineeringllc.com , then selecting
the agent called OntologyInterop1 .
At 10:19 AM 8/10/03 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>Several weeks ago we had an excellent discussion on expressing the
>relationship of entities that use different units-of-measure. The more
>general problem is - how do we express relationships that require a
>transformation between the entities?
>
>Based upon our discussions I have synthesized an approach to expressing
>transformation relationships, and an approach that applications can take
>to use this relationship information to enhance interoperability. Here
>is the URL to the paper I have written:
>
> http://www.xfront.com/interoperability/CanonicalForms.html
>
>Comments are welcome. /Roger
INTERNET BUSINESS LOGIC
Your English Business Rules Using Your Oracle Database
www.reengineeringllc.com
Adrian Walker
Reengineering LLC
PO Box 1412
Bristol
CT 06011-1412 USA
Phone: USA 860 583 9677
Cell: USA 860 830 2085
Fax: USA 860 314 1029
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: OntologyInterop1.txt
Received on Sunday, 10 August 2003 22:34:54 UTC