- From: Adrian Walker <adrianw@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:38:23 -0400
- To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20030810221732.02255040@pop.snet.net>
Roger -- Thanks for the pointer to your paper on Enhancing Data Interoperability. The idea seems very nice. Yet the notation kind of overwhelms even the simple illustrative examples. So, one wonders what real world examples would look like. I understand that the notation is intended to be machine- rather human-readable. But someone, or something has to write the content into it in the first place. Attached is an example, based on your paper, in a different notation. I'm guessing that there is a way of generating the Owl/rdf notation from the attached example. Do you think that would be useful ? Cheers, -- Adrian PS: The example can be run by pointing a Netscape or Mozilla browser to www.reengineeringllc.com , then selecting the agent called OntologyInterop1 . At 10:19 AM 8/10/03 -0400, you wrote: >Hi Folks, > >Several weeks ago we had an excellent discussion on expressing the >relationship of entities that use different units-of-measure. The more >general problem is - how do we express relationships that require a >transformation between the entities? > >Based upon our discussions I have synthesized an approach to expressing >transformation relationships, and an approach that applications can take >to use this relationship information to enhance interoperability. Here >is the URL to the paper I have written: > > http://www.xfront.com/interoperability/CanonicalForms.html > >Comments are welcome. /Roger INTERNET BUSINESS LOGIC Your English Business Rules Using Your Oracle Database www.reengineeringllc.com Adrian Walker Reengineering LLC PO Box 1412 Bristol CT 06011-1412 USA Phone: USA 860 583 9677 Cell: USA 860 830 2085 Fax: USA 860 314 1029
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: OntologyInterop1.txt
Received on Sunday, 10 August 2003 22:34:54 UTC