- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 08:30:48 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Forwarded from the RDFCore WG list... If you have an RDF implementation, do please take the time to hook it up to the tests and let us know how you get on. In addition to the raw test cases at [1] see also the RDF Test Cases working draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/ (or editors copy -- formally unpublished) at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-testcases-20030117/ for more context on the RDFCore Test infrastructure. cheers, Dan ----- Forwarded message from Eric Miller <em@w3.org> ----- From: Eric Miller <em@w3.org> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:46:17 -0400 To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org Subject: important: RDF Implementation status Message-Id: <6A809E21-BD1C-11D7-9DB6-000A9582FD3A@w3.org> Resent-From: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:46:20 -0400 (EDT) Working group member developers, We are in the process of assessing RDF implementation for drafting a directors decision and we need your help. Please run your code base against the test cases [1] and report your finding to w3c-rdf-comments as soon as possible. We need this in the next week. Please include in your finding the toolkit name and description. Describing your toolkits in RDF gets you bonus points :) [2] Please feel free to forward this request to other developers who are working on RDF toolkits. thanks for all of your help, --eric [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/EO/usecases/tools ----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 08:30:48 UTC