RE: rdf:li outside of rdf:Bag

> > > What does it mean to have an rdf:li element placed as the child of an
> > > element that isn't a collection element (rdf:Bag, rdf:Seq, rdf:Alt, or
> > > others)?  For instance, consider the following document:
> > >
> > > <?xml version="1.0"?>
> > > <!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [
> > > <!ENTITY jfc  "jfc://example#">
> > > <!ENTITY rdf  "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
> > > ]>
> > > <rdf:RDF xmlns:jfc="&jfc;" xmlns:rdf="&rdf;">
> > >       <jfc:arc rdf:about="#L1">
> > >               <jfc:arcrole rdf:resource="#L1role" />
> > >               <rdf:li>
> > >                       <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t0" />
> > >               </rdf:li>
> > >               <rdf:li>
> > >                       <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t1" />
> > >               </rdf:li>
> > >               <rdf:li>
> > >                       <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t2" />
> > >               </rdf:li>
> > >       </jfc:arc>
> > > </rdf:RDF>
>
>
> This is fine.  There is no requirement that the subject of an rdfs:member
> property, i.e. rdf:_nnn for some nnn be a container.
>

1. What does it mean?
2. Where does it say that jfc:arcrole isn't a container? That is, that it
isn't a subclass of rdf:Bag, rdf:Seq or rdf:Alt?

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 08:55:20 UTC