- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:43:18 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, jimbobbs <jimbobbs@hotmail.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 11:46 22/04/2003 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > >>>Jimmy Cerra said: > > > > What does it mean to have an rdf:li element placed as the child of an > > element that isn't a collection element (rdf:Bag, rdf:Seq, rdf:Alt, or > > others)? For instance, consider the following document: > > > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > <!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [ > > <!ENTITY jfc "jfc://example#"> > > <!ENTITY rdf "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> > > ]> > > <rdf:RDF xmlns:jfc="&jfc;" xmlns:rdf="&rdf;"> > > <jfc:arc rdf:about="#L1"> > > <jfc:arcrole rdf:resource="#L1role" /> > > <rdf:li> > > <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t0" /> > > </rdf:li> > > <rdf:li> > > <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t1" /> > > </rdf:li> > > <rdf:li> > > <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t2" /> > > </rdf:li> > > </jfc:arc> > > </rdf:RDF> This is fine. There is no requirement that the subject of an rdfs:member property, i.e. rdf:_nnn for some nnn be a container. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 08:42:30 UTC