- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:04:20 -0400
- To: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
* Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie> [2003-04-22 14:00+0100] > > > > > What does it mean to have an rdf:li element placed as the child of an > > > > element that isn't a collection element (rdf:Bag, rdf:Seq, rdf:Alt, or > > > > others)? For instance, consider the following document: > > > > > > > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > > > <!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [ > > > > <!ENTITY jfc "jfc://example#"> > > > > <!ENTITY rdf "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> > > > > ]> > > > > <rdf:RDF xmlns:jfc="&jfc;" xmlns:rdf="&rdf;"> > > > > <jfc:arc rdf:about="#L1"> > > > > <jfc:arcrole rdf:resource="#L1role" /> > > > > <rdf:li> > > > > <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t0" /> > > > > </rdf:li> > > > > <rdf:li> > > > > <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t1" /> > > > > </rdf:li> > > > > <rdf:li> > > > > <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t2" /> > > > > </rdf:li> > > > > </jfc:arc> > > > > </rdf:RDF> > > > > > > This is fine. There is no requirement that the subject of an rdfs:member > > property, i.e. rdf:_nnn for some nnn be a container. > > > > 1. What does it mean? > 2. Where does it say that jfc:arcrole isn't a container? That is, that it > isn't a subclass of rdf:Bag, rdf:Seq or rdf:Alt? It may be, we just can't tell that it is on the basis of the above RDF/XML. Or it may not. We're liberal like that... Dan
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 09:04:21 UTC