W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2003

Re: typed containers in RDFS: suggestions about the "long range" problem

From: Francesco CannistrÓ <fracan@inwind.it>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:11:56 +0200
Message-ID: <020901c30400$9d599230$1e961d97@Matrix>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Yuzhong Qu" <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>

> the need for "subClassOf" arises, I think, from ....


sorry for the incorrect reply to your post.
The fact is that when approached the problem I detected different possible
solution and finally chose that one I posted as the most suitable. In others
of my possible solutions (that however are too much articulated and about
which I had many dubts) the subClassOf seemed to me as necessary (even if,
looking at them now after your comments, perhaps it was not). Recently I
only tried to investigate again whether it was possible to do the same thing
in the RDFS domain without the need of OWL. But I have done it hurriedly and
absent-mindeldy, and then I made some banal errors when I unconsciously
applied the semantic I detected to resolve the problem (and that I
implemented in the OWL domain) into a domain where that semantics does not

Thanks for yuor comments.

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 06:12:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:41 UTC