- From: Francesco Cannistrà <fracan@inwind.it>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:50:15 +0200
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Yuzhong Qu" <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
> There is no need to use "rdfs:subClassOf ". the need for "subClassOf" arises, I think, from the fact that I want to constrain only the pocabulary schema and the processor, but not who writes RDF models. That is, I want the long range for a property be declared in the schema as follows: <rdf:Property rdf:ID="listApples"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#theDomain" /> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#BagOfApple" /> </rdf:Property> but then I want to manain the possibility for this property to be asserted not only through an explicit instance of BagOfApple, but through a generic rdf:Bag too, e.g.: <rdf:Description rdf:about="#my Subject"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="TheSchemaNamespace#theDomain" /> <voc:listApples> <rdf:Bag> <rdf:_1> <voc:Apple rdf:ID="item_1">...</voc:Apple> </rdf:_1> ...... </rdf:Bag> </voc:listApples> </rdf:Description> > Your topic (typed container) is very important, and the solution is enlightening. Thanks! Tnanks a lot :-) Regards, Francesco
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 04:50:44 UTC