- From: Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:31:40 +0000
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
This is just a musing. I wonder if it's possible to write RDF/XML without the use of namespaces if all the element names are aliased through an RDF schema to those in a different namespace using owl:sameClassAs. So long as basic striping rules are followed the resultant xml looks like, well, xml. Can this thought be taken a step further? Is it possible to define xml attributes that are aliases for rdf:resource and rdf:about? For example, here's some RSS 1.0 (chosen only as an example of an RDF application that uses many different namespaces) <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"> <channel rdf:about="http://internetalchemy.org/"> <title>Internet Alchemy</title> <link>http://internetalchemy.org/</link> <dc:language>en</dc:language> <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=2.21" /> <items> <rdf:Seq> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://internetalchemy.org/2002/11/weblogs.html" /> </rdf:Seq> </items> </channel> With an appropriate RDF Schema maybe it's possible to write the following instead: <rss> <Channel url="http://internetalchemy.org/"> <title>Internet Alchemy</title> <link>http://internetalchemy.org</link> <language>en</language> <generator id="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=2.21" /> <items> <List> <item id="http://internetalchemy.org/2002/11/weblogs.html" /> </List> </items> </Channel> </rss> Syntactic sugar for the author only. -- Ian <iand@internetalchemy.org> "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?"
Received on Saturday, 30 November 2002 06:48:50 UTC