# KEHOME/knowledge/theory/Epistemology/MyContext.txt
# Nov/26/2002
#============#
# My Context #
#============#
Suppose I make the statement
I saw Bob Hope in person at the Presidio.
What is the context of my statement? Quite literally,
it is everything I know.
at space=here, time=now, view=Dick McCullough knows {
I saw Bob Hope in person at the Presidio
}
How can you understand what I said?
Because your context is everything you know,
and our contexts have a lot in common.
at space=there, time=now, view=you know {
Dick McCullough saw Bob Hope in person at the Presidio
}
Note:
For this example, I'm leaving out the extra layer of context
at view=Dick McCullough says { ... }
From the viewpoint of knowledge representation, capturing
everything I know is a difficult problem. What can we do
to simplify that problem? I see two promising approaches.
1. We can use genus-differentia definitions to condense the
knowledge.
at view=Dick McCullough definitions { ... }
2. We can select only those definitions that are relevant to
the words in my statement.
at view=relevant Dick McCullough definitions { ... }
In theory, these are common-sense, reasonable approaches;
in practice, they need to be tested.
============
Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done
knowledge haspart list of proposition