- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:45:45 -0800
- To: <seth@robustai.net>, "rdfig" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Cc: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 17:45:55 UTC
1. hierarchy vs. lattice Hierarchies and lattices are defined by a species-genus relation, e.g. man iss animal In a class hierarchy, all classes have a unique genus, and all subclasses are disjoint. In a class lattice, some classes have multiple genus, and some subclasses are not disjoint. A proper set of genus-differentia definitions will define a class hierarchy. If you use a conflicting set of contexts, you will get a lattice instead. 2. New property? No, rdfs:subClassOf (alias iss*) already does that KR iss does it better ============ Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done knowledge haspart list of proposition ----- Original Message ----- From: Seth Russell To: rdfig Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:02 PM Subject: Re: RDF vocabulary definitions Richard H. McCullough wrote: <<With RDFS Classes, it's really a lattice, but: (a)that's too much technicaldetail for an introduction; (b)many people don't even realize that there's a difference between the two -- they use the word "hierarchy" when referring to a "lattice".>> Could you elaborate on the distinction between a heirachy and a lattice ? Do you think we should invent a new property to place a class within a lattice of properties? Seth Russell
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 17:45:55 UTC