- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:01:57 -0500
- To: David Menendez <zednenem@psualum.com>
- cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> At 10:48 PM -0500 2002-11-19, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> >These are true though, I think:
> >
> > x rdf:type rdfs:Property.
> > iff
> > x rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:Property.
> >
> >and
> >
> > x rdf:type rdfs:Class.
> > iff
> > x rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource.
> >
> >and that little asymmetry was confusing me.
>
> The second implication is true (it's rdfs7a), but I don't believe the
> first one is. As far as I'm aware, rdf:Property is a class, not a
> property, so it wouldn't have sub-properties.
Of course you're right again. I give up. :-) (I really
shouldn't try to do think when I'm sitting in meetings.)
(Is there a name for the Property which all Properties are
sub-properties of? I've heard people joke that it's rdfs:seeAlso,
but is it defined as something?)
-- sandro
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2002 10:02:25 UTC