- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:45:45 -0800
- To: "Jeen Broekstra" <jeen.broekstra@aidministrator.nl>
- Cc: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spin.ie>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <004101c2900c$a2b54070$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
At the time MyClass was defined -- simply declared to be a Class -- no extension was given, so technically the extension of MyClass is the empty set. I assume the author will provide additional statements to specify the individuals of MyClass. P.S. Note that in a subsequent email I corrected my statement to read as follows: The rdf-mt document http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-mt-20021112/ > says in Appendix A, "RDF Axioms": > rdf:type(?x,?y) iff ?y(?x) > The triple translation is > <?x> <rdf:type> <?y> iff <?x> <rdfs:subClassOf> <?y> or <?x> <rhm:individualOf> <?y> > The KR translation is > $x has rdf:type = ?y iff $x isa* $y ============ Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done knowledge haspart list of proposition ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeen Broekstra To: Richard H. McCullough Cc: Jon Hanna ; www-rdf-interest@w3.org Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:43 AM Subject: Re: RDF vocabulary definitions Richard H. McCullough wrote: > The rdf-mt document http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-mt-20021112/ > says in Appendix A, "RDF Axioms": > rdf:type(?x,?y) iff ?y(?x) > The triple translation is > <?x> <rdf:type> <?y> iff <?x> <rdfs:subClassOf> <?y> > The KR translation is > $x has type = $y iff $x isa* $y Looking at section 3.3 of the MT, you seem to be correct, though this is not reflected in the RDFS entailment rules in section 4. Section 3.3 (RDFS Interpretations): <x,y> is in IEXT(I(rdfs:subClassOf)) if and only if x and y are in IC and ICEXT(x) is a subset of ICEXT(y) Substituting: <MyClass, rdfs:Class> is in IEXT(I(rdfs:subclassOf)) if and only if 1. MyClass and rdfs:Class are in IC and 2. ICEXT(MyClass) is a subset of ICEXT(rdfs:Class) Condition 1 is trivially met. Condition 2 is met because ICEXT(MyClass) is the empty set. It's late and I'm tired. Am I overlooking something, or is this a bug? Best regards, Jeen
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 15:45:47 UTC