- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:45:45 -0800
- To: "Jeen Broekstra" <jeen.broekstra@aidministrator.nl>
- Cc: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spin.ie>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <004101c2900c$a2b54070$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
At the time MyClass was defined -- simply declared to be a Class -- no extension was given, so technically the extension of MyClass is the empty set. I assume the author will provide additional statements to specify the individuals of MyClass.
P.S. Note that in a subsequent email I corrected my statement to read as follows:
The rdf-mt document http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-mt-20021112/
> says in Appendix A, "RDF Axioms":
> rdf:type(?x,?y) iff ?y(?x)
> The triple translation is
> <?x> <rdf:type> <?y> iff <?x> <rdfs:subClassOf> <?y> or <?x> <rhm:individualOf> <?y>
> The KR translation is
> $x has rdf:type = ?y iff $x isa* $y
============
Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done
knowledge haspart list of proposition
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeen Broekstra
To: Richard H. McCullough
Cc: Jon Hanna ; www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: RDF vocabulary definitions
Richard H. McCullough wrote:
> The rdf-mt document http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-mt-20021112/
> says in Appendix A, "RDF Axioms":
> rdf:type(?x,?y) iff ?y(?x)
> The triple translation is
> <?x> <rdf:type> <?y> iff <?x> <rdfs:subClassOf> <?y>
> The KR translation is
> $x has type = $y iff $x isa* $y
Looking at section 3.3 of the MT, you seem to be correct, though this is
not reflected in the RDFS entailment rules in section 4.
Section 3.3 (RDFS Interpretations):
<x,y> is in IEXT(I(rdfs:subClassOf)) if and only if x and y are in IC
and ICEXT(x) is a subset of ICEXT(y)
Substituting:
<MyClass, rdfs:Class> is in IEXT(I(rdfs:subclassOf)) if and only if
1. MyClass and rdfs:Class are in IC
and
2. ICEXT(MyClass) is a subset of ICEXT(rdfs:Class)
Condition 1 is trivially met. Condition 2 is met because ICEXT(MyClass)
is the empty set.
It's late and I'm tired. Am I overlooking something, or is this a bug?
Best regards,
Jeen
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 15:45:47 UTC