- From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:43:25 -0000
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> I stand by my "hardly". "Hardly" is enough for a format that co-exists with others. If we had to choose between only RDF/XML and only N3 or something else it would be a different matter. Extracting dc:titles that way is a hack: for > example, you'd also need to get attribute values in case that instance's > author used abbreviated syntax (which they could do without changing the > graph). Not if I have rules on how the rdf content is formatted in my particular document type. Most RSS parsers aren't built on top of RDF parsers.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 10:37:31 UTC