Re: Can RDF thrive in an XML-centric world?

At 03:09 PM 11/4/02 +0000, David Allsopp wrote:
>AFAIK, it's still the case that one can create RDF graphs for which
>there is no XML-RDF representation; If so, that seems a pretty fatal
>flaw in a syntax.
>
>[Issue rdfms-qnames-cant-represent-all-uris: The RDF XML syntax cannot
>represent all possible Property URI's.
>Issue rdfms-syntax-incomplete: The RDF/XML syntax can't represent an an
>arbritary graph structure.]

Sure, it's a niggle, or even worse, but I don't think it's fatal in 
practice.  It just constrains one's choice of property URIs.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 12:54:41 UTC