- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:45:58 +0000
- To: David Allsopp <d.allsopp@signal.qinetiq.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
At 03:09 PM 11/4/02 +0000, David Allsopp wrote: >AFAIK, it's still the case that one can create RDF graphs for which >there is no XML-RDF representation; If so, that seems a pretty fatal >flaw in a syntax. > >[Issue rdfms-qnames-cant-represent-all-uris: The RDF XML syntax cannot >represent all possible Property URI's. >Issue rdfms-syntax-incomplete: The RDF/XML syntax can't represent an an >arbritary graph structure.] Sure, it's a niggle, or even worse, but I don't think it's fatal in practice. It just constrains one's choice of property URIs. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 12:54:41 UTC