- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 09:54:55 -0000
- To: "Chris Croome" <chris@webarchitects.co.uk>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Chris: > > I've done another test file based on this [1] but it doesn't generate a > triple for the language (or the direction) as is being suggested by the > DCMI [2]: > > > [2] http://dublincore.org/documents/2001/11/30/dcq-rdf-xml/#sec4 Thanks for the pointer, I will draw the attention of the WG to this. In the WG discussion my view has been that in M&S a literal is a pair consisting of a unicode string and a lang-tag. An RDF API, such as Jena, and an RDF parser, such as ARP, should provide access to both (which both do). Unfortunately the W3C validator site does not show the lang-tag. With such a pair, which currently appears to have WG support, the section you have pointed to is, at best, unnecessary. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 04:55:13 UTC