W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > July 2002


From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 17:57:04 +0100
To: "'RDF-Interest'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c2300e$7a8a13e0$887ba8c0@mitchum>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Danny Ayers

> I 
> was wondering what the views of the CC/PP and DAML-S folks 
> were on this, as presumably if this were the case (and 
> allowing for substitution of 'service' for 'agent', which I 
> think is acceptable in this context) then DAML-S is also 
> reinventing the CC/PP wheel.


Probably not. CC/PP is a domain model for device capabilities (if it's
generally applicable beyond devices, that would be a coincidence of
sorts). Even if DAML-S is reinventing the wheel, that's probably fair
game since CC/PP hasn't been so widely deployed (happy to be corrected
on that nonetheless, certainly I'm not aware of much code that can
reason about CC/PP). There are more than a few systems out there that
are keying off the UA string to do CC/PP's job. That wouldn't be case
for DAML-S if we could normatively link it in with WSDL, which I hope
will be done.

Bill de hÓra


Received on Saturday, 20 July 2002 12:58:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:37 UTC