> -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Danny Ayers > I > was wondering what the views of the CC/PP and DAML-S folks > were on this, as presumably if this were the case (and > allowing for substitution of 'service' for 'agent', which I > think is acceptable in this context) then DAML-S is also > reinventing the CC/PP wheel. Danny, Probably not. CC/PP is a domain model for device capabilities (if it's generally applicable beyond devices, that would be a coincidence of sorts). Even if DAML-S is reinventing the wheel, that's probably fair game since CC/PP hasn't been so widely deployed (happy to be corrected on that nonetheless, certainly I'm not aware of much code that can reason about CC/PP). There are more than a few systems out there that are keying off the UA string to do CC/PP's job. That wouldn't be case for DAML-S if we could normatively link it in with WSDL, which I hope will be done. Bill de hÓra .. Propylon www.propylon.comReceived on Saturday, 20 July 2002 12:58:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:37 UTC