- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:52:36 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
At 09:23 12/07/2002 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] [...] >Well, for example, how would this all impact a query system for RDF? How >would it impact an extension to RDF, like OWL, that has a stronger notion >of equality than RDF does? I'm hoping we might get some help understanding those implications as a result of this request for input. How do you think OWL might be affected? [...] >I will do, Thanks. > but the basic idea is quite simple, requiring that all literals >in RDF graphs be types, you mean "typed" - yes? > not just strings. If this is done, then there are >no semantic issues with respect to datatypes, only syntax issues. I hope the WG will take note of this point. Brian
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2002 05:54:05 UTC