>>>Aaron Swartz said: > Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org> wrote: > > > Does it mean that all unprefixed attributes will > > "assume" the prefix of their owner element for the purposes of which > > predicate will be used or which RDF syntactic "keyword" is desired? > > It is my understanding that we do not currently suggest an interpretation > for parsers to use. However, I have queried the list on this: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0069.html At the most recent RDF Core meeting we discussed some new words I suggested about this issue: 1) unprefixed attributes have no meaning in RDF and must not be used (excepting backwards-compatible accepting of rdf namespace attributes such as about, id etc.) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0035.html and the above words were accepted. This decision was recorded in Draft minutes of 2001-05-11 RDF Core WG teleconference http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/att-0060/01-2001-05-11.html#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Is this sufficient? DaveReceived on Sunday, 13 May 2001 12:49:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:30 UTC