- From: Meltsner, Kenneth <Kenneth.Meltsner@ca.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 11:24:05 -0400
- To: "R.V.Guha" <guha@alpiri.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Side issue: Did Peirce influence Minsky? I can certainly see the differences between frames (in the various interpretations since Minsky) and conceptual maps, but there are also similarities. Ken Meltsner -----Original Message----- From: R.V.Guha [mailto:guha@alpiri.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:57 AM To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org Subject: Re: Mentographs a go-go With all due respect to Charles Sanders Pierce & Shank's work, the RDF data model was in large part inspired by a combination of Minsky's frames and traditional predicate logic (with arity restrictions). guha Seth Russell wrote: > From: "Danny Ayers" <danny@panlanka.net> > > > Look what you've done now Seth, even TimBL's at it : > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/04/roadmap/ > > Well, to be honest, I doubt that my efforts have even come on TimBl's radar > screen. There has been a long tradition of representing knowledge with > labeled directed graphs starting (perhaps) with Charles Sanders Pierce. I > think John Sowa was the first to have popularized them, see [1]. But for > the record my mentography was heavily influenced not by Sowa's work, but my > Shank's Conceptual Dependency diagrams and was developed around 1978 when I > started working on CyberMind [2]. I discovered Sowa's and Pierce's work > two decades later around the time I published [3]. > > [1] http://www.bestweb.net/~sowa/cg/ > [2] http://robustai.net/mentography/cmap_vs_sem.gif > [3] http://robustai.net/ai/symknow.htm > > Seth
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2001 11:27:14 UTC