Hello all, is this a valid RDF: <rdfs:Property ID="aProperty"> <rdf:comment>This is a somewhat important property.</rdf:comment> <aProperty rdf:resource="http://resource"/> </rdfs:Property> where default namespace is this document. Some examples out of the blue: usefulness of being useful sense of having sense importance of being important smartness of being smart thoughtfulness of being thoughtful existence of existence etc. This is a pessimistic one :-) <rdf:Property ID="sense"> <rdf:comment>A measure of making sense on the scale 1 to 100.</rdf:comment> <sense>5</sense> </rdf:Property> And here is another one. Russian writer M. Gorkiy in a play "On the bottom" has this idea that being kind is not kind at all. Could this be modeled: <rdfs:Property ID="kindness"> <kindness>0</kindness> </rdfs:Property> I guess the proper way to formulate the question is: is it valid from RDF standpoint (an why not?) if subject and predicate are same? Object and subject can obviously be same: My advisor is myself, for example. All three are the same: vagueness of being vague is vague Thanks, --Nikita.Received on Sunday, 15 July 2001 02:00:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:31 UTC