- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:46:11 +0100
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
In many of the cases in rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (specifically 02, 07, 11, 12, 13, 14) there are resources which have an rdf:ID (or rdf:bagID) value, but then in the n-triple they are anonymous (e.g. '<Seq rdf:ID="container">' in test11.rdf, the resource becomes '_:container' in test11.n3). One of the test cases rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test04.n3 gives an n3 spec rather than n-triples, which makes life harder for me. Perhaps the others in that directory are also really n3 and don't make a clear distinction between anonymous and non-anonymous nodes. [I don't know n3, and I am trusting the Jena n-triple processor to read the files]. Jeremy Carroll HP Labs
Received on Friday, 13 July 2001 13:42:18 UTC