- From: Ayalew Kassahun <A.Kassahun@InfoRay.NL>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:18:38 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Ok, redland with repat ... question 2 is answered to me but 1 no yet? > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Beckett [mailto:dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk] > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 3:41 PM > To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Cc: Ayalew Kassahun > Subject: Re: Container Resources and Reified statement - which is the > correct parser out there? > > > >>>Ayalew Kassahun said: > > > 1 - I do not understand why Redland 'reifies' statement > with ID 'res1'?! > > 2 - I do not understand why Redland and CARA 'reify' > statement stat3. This > > seems to me wrong.?! > > Redland is not a parser; it has them (SiRPAC-w3c, SiRPAC-stanford, > Repat, libwww). So these statements are incomplete; "Redland with > parser X ..." would have a meaning. > > Dave >
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2001 10:06:52 UTC