Re: Container Resources and Reified statement - which is the correct parser out there? from Dave Beckett on 2001-01-11 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from January 2001)

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 14:41:02 +0000
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
CC: Ayalew Kassahun <A.Kassahun@InfoRay.NL>
Message-ID: <2457.979224062@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

>>>Ayalew Kassahun said:

> 1 - I do not understand why Redland 'reifies' statement with ID 'res1'?!
> 2 - I do not understand why Redland and CARA 'reify' statement stat3. This
> seems to me wrong.?! 

Redland is not a parser; it has them (SiRPAC-w3c, SiRPAC-stanford,
Repat, libwww).  So these statements are incomplete; "Redland with
parser X ..." would have a meaning.

Dave

Received on Thursday, 11 January 2001 09:41:25 UTC