- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 07:20:09 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab" <siglun@gungner.lub.lu.se>
- cc: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Well, you could write an RDF schema... Charles McCN On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab wrote: > What I mean by that basically boils down to this: If properties are uniquely > identified by the concatenation of their namespace and element/attribute > name as specified in the RDF M&S, how are we supposed to know that > http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.0/title == > http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title? This is a DCMI problem, for sure, but it is even more a RDF problem. Please consider the fact that we today have tools available that makes it possible to create a RDF schema definition with a point and click user interface. How different namespaces will have appeared five years from now with title elements with basically the same semantics as a dc 1.1 title? The single most important problem for the semantic web initiative is to tackle semantic diversity.
Received on Monday, 16 October 2000 07:20:53 UTC