- From: Alex Muc <alex.muc@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:19:04 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi, I apologize for sending this message twice, but wouldn't you know it, my internet connection went down about 5 minutes after I sent the message. If you are interested, you can try the link again, it should be accessible. Thanks Alex. Alex Muc wrote: > RDF Community, > > I'll cut to the chase to begin with and then develop my thoughts a > little more a little later on in this message. > > I have developed a relatively simple and small web-based RDF triple > modelling engine. I have been using it to capture and modify RDF models > (schemas and instances). The models in my current system are about web > pages and various other entities. > You can take a look at the current state of system at the following URL: > > http://24.112.129.151:8080/metadata/index2.jsp > I'd appreciate any comments or questions that anyone has about what I've > done. If anyone is interested, I'd consider open-sourcing the code as > well. > > Now some background: > I had the opportunity to work for the World Health Organization this > summer in Geneva, Switzerland in their information management > department. While there I was given the task of evaluating various > methods for helping them build, what they called, "a top-level > navigation layer for their website". The navigation layer was supposed > to be XML-based. Their current web-site has developed in a relatively > ad-hoc way over the last 5 or so years and it is at the point where > those who know anything about it consider it an unmanageable mess. You > can take a look at it if you want, visit www.who.int. Anyways, the > project I was working on was building this "top-level navigation layer" > which could be put in place on the site as an interim measure while they > considered what to do next to build a better website. The project never > made it to completion, and never made it past what I would call a > proof-of-concept and that is what the above link will show you. Sorry > for all this background info but I figured a little contextual > information may help. > > The engine itself: > - It is essentially an RDF triple editor. > - It uses Sergey Melnik's RDF API as a base set of objects. > - It is written in Java and JSP and makes some use of Cocoon (a > web-based, XML publishing engine, visit xml.apache.org/cocoon) > - It uses an SQL back end for persistence. The data model is the one > proposed by Brian McBride on Sergey Melnik's "Storing RDF in a > relational model" page at > http://WWW-DB.Stanford.EDU/~melnik/rdf/db.html. Except it doesn't use > the SQL "views" feature. > - It started off as a simple RDF triple editor but as development has > progressed more and more of that has been pushed into the background. > - The system has the ability to import arbitrary SQL data sets. This > was a requirement for what I was doing because WHO has a lot of > metadata-like data lying around in various SQL servers which they > thought should be in a system such as this. This basically represents > an SQL table as a class and the rows as instances, but it has the > ability to do parent-child (look-up table) relationships and things like > that. You can try this out if you want. > - There is a simple RDF Class browser and editor which is completely > dynamically built and driven depending on the resource that you are > working with. > - There is a simple example, with realtively random data, of the > "top-level navigation layer" which the project was ultimately supposed > to produce. This is really an example of "acting on" the RDF data of > the system. Much of the work I had been doing was to capture RDF data, > this example was a "use" of that data. > - By the end of summer the system I had developed contained about 10,000 > triples, 1000 resources and 2000 literals. It was running very happily > with a MySQL database backend on a PIII 550. > - The user interface is very ugly at this point. I focused my efforts > on making it do something useful and never got around to making it look > "pretty". I'm hoping you'll all be able to look beyond that. > > If you've made it this far you may actually be interested in this > project. I am currently back in school finishing my degree and as a > result I do not have too much time to work on this. That being said I > would happily open-source what I've got so far so that others could work > on it. I also have some computing resources which could be thrown at > the project to actually provide it a home. > > Feel free to poke around in the system and add/delete/modify any of the > data (I have backup copies). You can try the SQL import facility if you > want, and can figure it out, it's pretty self-explanatory. You can add > classes and instances 'till your heart is content. You can also add > properties to classes dynamically and they should appear in the > instances immediately, although, as I recall, I was having some caching > problems with this. If you make changes and certain things don't seem > to be appearing correctly visit this page: > http://24.112.129.151:8080/metadata/dbStatus.jsp and click on the "Clear > All Local Caches" link. > > Some interesting starting points: > http://24.112.129.151:8080/metadata/resource.jsp?rID=26 - Metadata for > the WHO home page. > http://24.112.129.151:8080/metadata/resource.jsp?rID=364 - SQL import > specification described in RDF. > http://24.112.129.151:8080/metadata/resource.jsp?rID=25 - Metadata about > Steve, the creator of the home page. > > Long-term stuff: > As a proof of concept I think this engine is really quite useful. It > pulls together a bunch of RDF work done by other people -- the W3 > recommendations, Sergey Melnik's API, a persistence model implementation > -- and actually demonstrates something which is borderline-useful. > Other projects that I know of along these lines are the Protege project > developed at Stanford and the WRAF project. I would see the work I > developed being something like the Protege project in the long-term, > although RDF and web-based from the ground up. I haven't experimented > with WRAF so I can't compare it to that. My impression is that RDF was > initially developed for webpage metadata, but it is sufficiently general > to model entire systems (data, objects, interconnects, etc.) and I think > a tool which could do that would be very useful. I may be wrong though. > > Anyways I hope some of you have a few minutes to try it out. Again, any > questions or comments are welcome. > Thanks > Alex Muc.
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 10:20:37 UTC