- From: McBride, Brian <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:39:31 +0100
- To: "'David Allsopp'" <dallsopp@signal.dera.gov.uk>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
There is in general no prohibition as you suggest, so in theory the same resource can be the subject and object of a statement, an even also the predicate. I have built two RDF implementations and haven't yet found this to be a problem. There are some restrictions on the creation of loops in rdf schema. The subClassOf and subPropertyOf properties are constrained to not form loops - so a class can not be a subClass of itself. It has been suggested that these restrictions be lifted, but they are in the current spec. Brian McBride HPLabs > -----Original Message----- > From: David Allsopp [mailto:dallsopp@signal.dera.gov.uk] > Sent: 05 October 2000 11:38 > To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: Circular references in RDF data model > > > Hello all, > > A quick question abou the RDF data model: > > I can't see any prohibition in the RDF Specification on circular > references in RDF triples (such that the subject and object > are the same > resource). Is this correct? It looks like a pitfall for > implementors (a > likely cause of infinite loop bugs), but perhaps I've missed > something? > > Regards, > > David. > > > -- > Dr David Allsopp > Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. >
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2000 08:39:35 UTC