- From: <Ora.Lassila@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 08:48:53 -0500
- To: wdehora@cromwellmedia.co.uk
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Bill, you wrote: > Example: > > (A) (Tom, hunts, Jerry) > > (B) (rdf:type, X, rdf:Statement) > (rdf:predicate, X, hunts) > (rdf:subject, X, Tom) > (rdf:object, X, Jerry) > > Does an RDF model containing (A) implicitly contain (B)? > Does (B) imply (A)? As for the first question, my answer would be "does it matter?". Unless there is some triple in your system where X is the subject (the first element of the triple), you have not introduced new information. As for the second question, the answer is *definitely* "no", B does not imply A: RDF statements, represented as triples, are considered "facts" from the standpoint of a running RDF processor. In order to talk about statements we do not consider as facts, we represent them in the reified form (this is an explicit design decision we made in the M+S WG). Regards, - Ora -- Ora Lassila, <ora.lassila@nokia.com> Research Manager Agent Technology, Nokia Research Center / Boston +1 (781) 993-4603 (please note new email & phone number!)
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2000 09:53:35 UTC