- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:57:46 -0500
- To: "William Grosso" <grosso@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
- Cc: "Greg FitzPatrick" <gf@medianet.org>, <xml-dev@xml.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: William Grosso <grosso@SMI.Stanford.EDU> >> (From http://www.w3.org/2000/calendar/clendar.rdfs which is not a serious >> effort in any way - just a play with protege and full of junk) >This link doesn't work (nor does ...calendar.rdfs or ...calender.rdfs) >I'd like to see the project (though I think we've fixed the bug). Sorry http://www.w3.org/2000/calendar/calendar.rdfs now has global access as does the .rdf >> In fact the fact that from Protegé's point of view something is >> a subclass of Thing is of course information-free. It should >> therefore be omitted from the serialization. >> > >I think it is now :-). I just looked over a couple of rdfs files >generated by the current version and there's no mention of :THING. cool! It looks as though others are way ahead in the iCalendar->RDF mapping game! the game is over when there is (a) an RDF schema online for the RDF voabulary, and (b) a java class which generates triples from an icalendar message. tim
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2000 13:58:07 UTC