Re: A certain difficulty

Hi,

> When looking at the first results of my tinkering the first 
> thing I noticed was that any subclass of protogé:Thing was 
> declared to be such. So my file full of my local concepts
> has a pointer back to stanford as well as pointers back to 
> the RDFS concepts.
> ....

> (From http://www.w3.org/2000/calendar/clendar.rdfs which is not a serious
> effort in any way - just a play with protege and full of junk)

This link doesn't work (nor does ...calendar.rdfs or ...calender.rdfs) 
I'd like to see the project (though I think we've fixed the bug). 

> In fact the fact that from Protegé's point of view  something is 
> a subclass of Thing is of course information-free.  It should 
> therefore be omitted from the serialization.
> 

I think it is now :-). I just looked over a couple of rdfs files 
generated by the current version and there's no mention of :THING. 


William Grosso
-- 
William Grosso 			grosso@smi.stanford.edu
Phone 650-498-4255 		http://www.smi.stanford.edu/people/grosso/

Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2000 13:38:56 UTC