- From: William Grosso <grosso@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:38:53 -0800
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- CC: Greg FitzPatrick <gf@medianet.org>, xml-dev@xml.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi, > When looking at the first results of my tinkering the first > thing I noticed was that any subclass of protogé:Thing was > declared to be such. So my file full of my local concepts > has a pointer back to stanford as well as pointers back to > the RDFS concepts. > .... > (From http://www.w3.org/2000/calendar/clendar.rdfs which is not a serious > effort in any way - just a play with protege and full of junk) This link doesn't work (nor does ...calendar.rdfs or ...calender.rdfs) I'd like to see the project (though I think we've fixed the bug). > In fact the fact that from Protegé's point of view something is > a subclass of Thing is of course information-free. It should > therefore be omitted from the serialization. > I think it is now :-). I just looked over a couple of rdfs files generated by the current version and there's no mention of :THING. William Grosso -- William Grosso grosso@smi.stanford.edu Phone 650-498-4255 http://www.smi.stanford.edu/people/grosso/
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2000 13:38:56 UTC