- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 16:17:15 -0000
- To: "ML RDF-interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3c.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian, : Consider a statement S which occurs in two documents, : http://foo and http://bar. : : Let RS be a reified statement representing both S and : its occurrence in http://foo. Thus: : : (occursIn, RS, http://foo) : : is true. You opener is ambiguous. When you say "both S and its occurence", does "its" refer to S or RS? If S then your ensuing statement might be true iff RS is present with S in http://foo. If RS is present then the ensuing statement is true. By "present" I mean syntactically/literally present. More ambiguity. What are the intended semantics of "occursIn" wrt to a model of a statement? Does it mean syntactically/literally present, or, does it mean can be inferred by the presence of the statement being modelled, or, does it mean something else? Also, I'm not altogether sure that RS can represent both S and its occurence. Again this is ambiguous. Do you mean an occurence of S within http://foo, or do you mean that RS stands for the statement S and any occurence/instance of S? A while back I posted a request that the RDFm clean up its language wrt to refication in future versions, and I believe you were the only one who followed up in agreement. And this is why: the simplest of discussions on this matter become torturous otherwise. We've spent a lot of time going round and round in this area which could have been greatly reduced if we had less ambiguous terms to use. : Is : : (occursIn, RS, http://bar) : : true? It might be true. But it might be false also. There isn't enough information to determine one way or another. : Is this a contradiction? Probably not. : I really don't understand why folks are so reluctant : to accept that statements and their occurrences are : two different concepts and need different resources : to model them. What is the big deal? I don't know what you mean exactly by "occurrences" but I suspect you're right. - -Bill de hÓra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0 iQA/AwUBOkIs8OaWiFwg2CH4EQKEPQCgtdSC8dLErSaF7RHeD1GlktSTJZEAoPKG DHuYu0mLADAdLtW0lC85afsc =1cKw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2000 11:23:35 UTC