- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 16:37:55 -0000
- To: "Terje Bless" <link@tss.no>, "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Cc: "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net>, "W3C Validator" <www-validator@w3.org>, "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> > Hmm, this would be a good thing for the W3C to pursue. It'd > > be nice if the validator not only provided a Web badge, but > > also a little snippet of RDF This conversation fell flat on its behind for a reason: EDL. Basically, the WAI ERT group are creating an RDF format for evaluations of any sort. One of these could be accissibility assertions (ADL) and another could be the output on the XHTML validator. On another line of investigation that this discussion started off, we are already investigating how Web pages could have indexing pieces of RDF in them using the profile attribute. See http://www.mysterylights.com/sbp/adotsw/#sdp9 and soon http://uwimp.com/ (try http://www210.pair.com/wimpy2/index.htm for now). Please bug the Evil Genious[tm] about these matters when you get the time :-) I unsubscribed from www-validator ages ago, so please CC to me at sean@mysterylights.com, cheers. Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer http://www.mysterylights.com/sbp/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF] "Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2000 11:39:03 UTC