- From: McBride, Brian <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 22:00:52 -0000
- To: RDF-IG <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I thought I'd seen this question before, but in fact it was a similar question about rdfs:domain. Ralph Swicks response is at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Aug/0044.html Perhaps its because the authors felt that such a constraint would add no information. The object of any property is constrained to be either an object or a literal by the RDF model. Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: Seth Russell [mailto:seth@robustai.net] > Sent: 06 December 2000 21:32 > To: RDF-IG > Subject: How is the range of an rdf:object specified in rdfs ? > > > The [RDF Schema] has the following description of the > rdf:object property of the reification quad: > > <rdf:Property > about="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#object"> > <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">object</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">objet</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:domain > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Statement"/> > > </rdf:Property> > > Why doesn't this this description show that the range of the > object must be a resource or a literal? > What am i missing here? > > [RDF Schema] http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema > > Seth Russell > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 17:01:00 UTC