- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:43:48 -0400
- To: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
At 04:27 AM 8/10/2000 -0400, James Tauber wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, James Tauber wrote: >> >> > I didn't get any replies to an earlier query as to why the >> domain and range >> > of "domain" aren't defined in the RDF schema for RDF schemas. >> >> Hrm, shouldn't the domain of "domain" be "RDF properties" and >> the range >> be "RDF classes"? > >Yep. But I wondered why the RDF schema for RDF schemas doesn't say so. Interesting; I expect it is an editorial oversight. Those constraints are given in the prose: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/#s3.1.4 just not in the RDF. Unfortunate. They're present in the RDF for rdfs:range, so it's an odd oversight.
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2000 14:45:16 UTC