- From: McBride, Brian <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 14:00:02 -0000
- To: ML RDF-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3c.org>
OK, I'll walk into that one. By equivalent, I take it we mean repesents the same graph/set of triples. The answer depends on the view you take about generating bags to represent the surface syntax of the input. If you take the view that the bags are generated, then the two are not equivalent. If you take the view that the bags are not generated unless a bagId is present, then they seem equivalent to me. Or have I missed the point? Brian McBride HPLabs > -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN [mailto:champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr] > Sent: 02 December 2000 12:38 > To: ML RDF-interest > Subject: Reificarion poll > > > Still investigating issues about reification... > > Are, in your opinion, the following RDF piece, equivalent ?? > > Example 1: > > <rdf:Description about="#d1" xmlns:my="http://schemas.org/"> > <my:prop rdf:id="s1"> Foo </my:prop> > </rdf:Description> > <rdf:Description about="#s1"/> > <my:prop> Bar </my:prop/> > </rdf:Description> > > > Example 2: > > <rdf:Description about="#d1" xmlns:my="http://schemas.org/"> > <my:prop> Foo </my:prop> > </rdf:Description> > <rdf:Statement id="s1"> > <rdf:subject resource="#d1"/> > <rdf:predicate resource="http://schemas.org/prop"/> > <rdf:object> Foo </rdf:object> > </rdf:Statement> > <rdf:Description about="#s1"/> > <my:prop> Bar </my:prop/> > </rdf:Description> > > Pierre-Antoine >
Received on Saturday, 2 December 2000 09:00:22 UTC