- From: Ray Fergerson <fergerson@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:00:29 -0700
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Brian, I think that things are not quite so bad (or good, depending on your point of view) as you indicate. It is too generous to say that we are a high level language compiler where RDF is assembly. At most I would say that we are an IDE with a macro assembly language processor. It is true we hide the RDF syntax and don't allow you to muck with it directly from within the tool. My sense from the discussion about the RDF syntax on this list is that most would argue that this is a good thing. First, if you haven't already, I'd suggest that you download the tool and try it out. There is a paper describing Protege <-> RDF available off of the top page at our web site (http://www.smi.stanford.edu/projects/protege) which may be of interest if you like the tool. We are completely reworking our RDF backend (reading and writing) support at the moment and hope to have a new release this month. Ray
Received on Friday, 14 April 2000 12:58:38 UTC