- From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@paranormal.o.se>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 20:20:28 +0100
- To: Daniel LaLiberte <liberte@w3.org>, RDF Intrest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Daniel LaLiberte wrote:
>
> Jonas Liljegren writes:
> > Now, assuming MD5 model URIs, we would like to differ between:
> >
> > 1. The URI of the service
> > 2. The URL of the service
> > 3. The URI for the physical person
> > 4. The URI of the model describing the person
> > 5. The URL of the model describing the person
> > 6. The URI of the model describing the service
> > 7. The URL of the model describing the service
>
> I'm curious what you are thinking of as the difference between URIs and
> URLs.
With the suggested RDF API, the model URI would be a MD5 digest, but the
model URL would be the place there you can get it.
To minimize confusion about what the URI denotes, the person URI should
not be a URL leading to a document. All URIs leading to a document would
be seen as the URI of that document, rather than the URI for something
in "the real world".
See the previous discussion on this:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/1999Dec/0055.html
--
/ Jonas - http://paranormal.o.se/perl/proj/rdf/schema_editor/
Received on Monday, 13 December 1999 14:11:05 UTC