- From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@paranormal.o.se>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 20:20:28 +0100
- To: Daniel LaLiberte <liberte@w3.org>, RDF Intrest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Daniel LaLiberte wrote: > > Jonas Liljegren writes: > > Now, assuming MD5 model URIs, we would like to differ between: > > > > 1. The URI of the service > > 2. The URL of the service > > 3. The URI for the physical person > > 4. The URI of the model describing the person > > 5. The URL of the model describing the person > > 6. The URI of the model describing the service > > 7. The URL of the model describing the service > > I'm curious what you are thinking of as the difference between URIs and > URLs. With the suggested RDF API, the model URI would be a MD5 digest, but the model URL would be the place there you can get it. To minimize confusion about what the URI denotes, the person URI should not be a URL leading to a document. All URIs leading to a document would be seen as the URI of that document, rather than the URI for something in "the real world". See the previous discussion on this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/1999Dec/0055.html -- / Jonas - http://paranormal.o.se/perl/proj/rdf/schema_editor/
Received on Monday, 13 December 1999 14:11:05 UTC