- From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:33:10 -0800
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Hello, Congratulations on your RDF/XML Syntax Proposed Recommendation [1]. One quick comment before the review deadline passes. Re: "The DCMI has used and recommended rel="meta" when linking in RFC 2731 - Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTML[RFC-2731] however rel="alternate" may also be appropriate." [2] This may have come up before. Scanning RFC 2731 quickly, I don't see link rel="meta" anywhere. dublincore.org used it though it is not in the HTML 4 and XHTML 1.0 specs. With some help from people on this list, here is what we did in http://www.w3.org/Overview.html: <link id="meta" rel="rel:meta" href="http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/#meta" /> <link rel="meta" href="Overview-about.rdf" /> where http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/#meta defines a profile [3] for the "meta" link type. I'm sorry this is a little cumbersome and the profile is rudimentary but it is technically correct and best practice as far as I know. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PR-rdf-syntax-grammar-20031215/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PR-rdf-syntax-grammar-20031215/#section-rdf-in-HTML [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#adef-profile Best wishes for your project, -- Susan Lesch http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/ mailto:lesch@w3.org tel:+1.858.483.4819 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2004 00:39:27 UTC