- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:10:42 -0600
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: herman.ter.horst@philips.com, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 17:59, pat hayes wrote: > [...] So I accept that this addition to > the text would be an improvement, I do not feel that this is worth, > as it were, stopping the presses for (even if the presses could be > stopped, which they cannot at this stage.) The Proposed Rec has gone out, but review of that document is in order thru 19Jan. Does anybody feel energized to start a new thread, garbage-collecting all the obsolete bits, and making clear what's outstanding w.r.t. http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PR-rdf-mt-20031215/ ? [...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 5 January 2004 17:10:43 UTC