- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:24:45 +0200
- To: <seth@robustai.net>, "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
>Well that feels very much like "Let them eat cake". We *do* want >people to use the same property to refer from one RDF graph to another, >and for that to happen the WG should (imho) put semref in RDFS. On the need I agree with Seth - right now I'm heading towards a painfully arbitrary interpretation of this kind of link in the app I'm working on. On the other hand, I'm not entirely convinced the benefits of adding a new element outway the rejiggling it would cause. I suppose my own preferrence would be for there to be a standardised approach to qualifying seeAlso/isDefinedBy (strictly speaking, ok, there is already a standard - 'use RDF!', but guidelines on this might help keep people reading from the same map). If there was a consensus way of doing this, then semref: could easily be layer on top as a kind of abbreviation for the triples needed in a qualified seeAlso/isDefinedBy. Cheers, Danny.
Received on Monday, 30 September 2002 05:35:08 UTC