- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 30 Aug 2002 12:26:48 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 11:55, Brian McBride wrote: > Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org > indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. Yes, this is acceptable. > Dan, Peter > In > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002AprJun/0059.html > > you raised an issue which was captured in > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-duplicate-member-props > > as > > [[[ > Model and Syntax says that a container can't have duplicate member properties. > ]]] > > As recorded in > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002May/0028.html > > the RDFCore WG has decided to close this issue with the following resolution: > [[ > <rdf:Bag rdf:about="http://example.org/foo"> > <rdf:_1 rdf:resource="http://example.org/a" /> > <rdf:_1 rdf:resource="http://example.org/b" /> > </rdf:Bag> > > is syntactically legal RDF. > ]] > > Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org > indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. > > Brian McBride > RDFCore co-chair -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 30 August 2002 13:26:44 UTC