- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:16:24 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
For the record... yes, this is acceptable. #g -- At 02:46 PM 8/19/02 +0100, Brian McBride wrote: >Graham, > >In > > http://public.research.mimesweeper.com/RDF/RDFContexts.html > >you raised an issue which was captured in > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-contexts > >as > >[[[ >The idea of contexts has occurred on several occasions on the mailing >lists. Graham Klyne has written a detailed paper on the issue, and there >are other uses of the term, e.g. in N3. >]]] > >As recorded in > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020617-f2f/ > >the RDFCore WG has decided to postpone this issue to a future version of RDF. > >Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org >indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. > >Brian McBride >RDFCore co-chair ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 13:24:04 UTC