- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:02:02 +0100
- To: francoisleygues@yahoo.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Francois,
In
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Apr/0067.html
you raised an issue which was captured in
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-constraining-containers
as
[[[
Is it possible to constrain the members of a container to be of a given type?
]]]
As recorded in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0406.html
the RDFCore WG resolved:
[[
o Expressing such a constraint is beyond the scope of RDFS. Such
functionality belongs with more powerful ontology languages such as
daml+oil and owl.
o The WG notes that DAML+OIL can express this constraint as described here.
o The WG closes this issue
]]
Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.
Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 19 August 2002 11:03:37 UTC