RE: QName is ambiguous; aren't datatypes unambiguous? union types total?

On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 22:35, wrote:
> I see where you're coming from, Dan, but I suspect the horse has already 
> left the barn on this one.

Well, we agree what the problem/issue is, anyway,
if not now to solve/address it.

Thanks for the response. Please keep me posted on any
relevant decisions the WG makes.

Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 15:38:15 UTC